by Jim the Realtor | May 21, 2013 | Actives/Pendings, Average DOM, Frenzy, Market Conditions, North County Coastal |
Realtors including myself say that we have “low inventory”, but it’s not because fewer sellers are listing – it’s because the heavy demand is gobbling them up faster, and at higher prices:
NSDCC Listings and Sales between Jan 1 and May 15
Year |
Total Listings |
Sales |
Avg $$/sf |
Avg DOM |
2009 |
2,163 |
596 |
$399/sf |
71 |
2010 |
2,167 |
837 |
$380/sf |
73 |
2011 |
2,266 |
891 |
$374/sf |
82 |
2012 |
1,910 |
991 |
$374/sf |
84 |
2013 |
2,057 |
1,118 |
$405/sf |
49 |
The sales amounted to only a quarter of the total listings in 2009, and this year they are half!
We know that the higher-end market is sluggish at best (there are 713 active listings over $1M). Here’s a look at the UNDER-$1,000,000 markets:
NSDCC UNDER-$1,000,000 – Actives and Pendings/Contingents
City or Area |
#Actives |
#Pend/Cont |
Carlsbad |
115 |
186 |
Carmel Vly |
28 |
51 |
Del Mar/SB |
6 |
11 |
Encinitas |
19 |
59 |
La Jolla |
10 |
9 |
RSF |
1 |
3 |
Totals |
179 |
319 |
On the street, it feels like the frenzy is slowing. But until the ACT/PEND ratios get closer to a more normal 2:1 (or at least 1:1), the UNDER-$1,000,000 market will continue to be very competitive.
The lowball season usually starts in June, but there are only 23 active listings under $1,000,000 that have been listed for more than 60 days (out of 184)!
by Jim the Realtor | Feb 12, 2013 | Actives/Pendings, Frenzy, Market Buzz, Market Conditions |
An update on the Actives/Pendings report – does anyone remember when it was called the Jim Ratio? One day fellow realtor Peter B. agreed with me that a 2:1 ratio of active listings to pendings were a normal market, and boom, the Jim Ratio was born.
The Under-$1,000,000 market is scorching, with more pendings than active listings in every area! The Over-$1,000,000 market is fairly healthy looking too, and better than it’s been has since we’ve kept track.
Detached-Home Listings UNDER $1,000,000
Town or Area |
Actives |
Pend/Cont |
A/P Ratio |
Carmel Vly |
16 |
42 |
0.38 |
Encinitas |
17 |
44 |
0.39 |
Carlsbad |
92 |
179 |
0.51 |
LJ/DM/RSF/SB |
24 |
31 |
0.77 |
Totals |
149 |
298 |
0.50 |
Detached-Home Listings OVER $1,000,000
Town or Area |
Actives |
Pend/Cont |
A/P Ratio |
Carmel Vly |
50 |
29 |
1.72 |
Encinitas |
58 |
30 |
1.93 |
Carlsbad |
47 |
19 |
2.47 |
LJ/DM/RSF/SB |
383 |
92 |
4.16 |
Totals |
538 |
170 |
3.16 |
Contingents make up 18% of the total Pend/Cont count, and are as good as pending these days when buyers who have been hanging on for months might reap a windfall of sudden appreciation. It is a feeding frenzy!
by Jim the Realtor | Jan 26, 2013 | Actives/Pendings, North County Coastal, Sales and Price Check |
The lower-end looks like it is picking up speed, and those selling above $1,000,000 shouldn’t feel bad either. Here are the active, contingent+pending, and sold listings for each area – the monthly sold count is the last six months of sales divided by 6.
Under-$1,000,000 Market
Town or Area |
Actives |
Cont+Pend |
Avg1Mo Sales |
Months’ of Inventory |
Encinitas |
14 |
52 |
25.3 |
0.55 |
Carmel Vly |
17 |
33 |
24.5 |
0.69 |
Carlsbad |
103 |
159 |
92.8 |
1.11 |
Del Mar/SB |
14 |
14 |
7.3 |
1.92 |
La Jolla |
14 |
12 |
6 |
2.33 |
RSF |
0 |
3 |
8 |
0 |
Totals |
163 |
273 |
157.3 |
1.04 |
Over-$1,000,000 Market
Town or Area |
Actives |
Cont+Pend |
Avg1Mo Sales |
Months’ of Inventory |
Carlsbad |
38 |
14 |
12 |
3.17 |
Carmel Vly |
47 |
24 |
14.7 |
3.20 |
Encinitas |
61 |
25 |
14.3 |
4.27 |
Del Mar/SB |
68 |
21 |
15.2 |
4.47 |
La Jolla |
109 |
39 |
21.3 |
5.12 |
RSF |
185 |
30 |
18.8 |
9.84 |
Totals |
508 |
153 |
96.3 |
5.28 |
The Over-$1,000,000 numbers are historically terrific, and sellers everywhere except in RSF should be jumping for joy. The Under-$1,000,000 market, with only one-months’ worth of inventory and 1.67 times as many pendings as actives, is out of control and cooking!
When is the best time to sell? When everyone else isn’t!
by Jim the Realtor | Jan 19, 2013 | Actives/Pendings, Market Buzz
We’ve compared active listings to pendings, and have seen how a 2:1 ratio is where a market seems healthy and balanced. Here are the active vs. contingent/pending listings of detached-homes:
Region/Area |
ACT listings |
C+P listings |
Ratio |
NSDCC South |
664 |
398 |
2.95:1 |
NSDCC North |
209 |
244 |
0.86:1 |
SD County |
3,086 |
4,435 |
0.70:1 |
The lower-end is cooking, and sellers are enjoying parades of shoppers during the first week of being on the market. Is it healthy and balanced to have more pendings than actives? Sellers think so!
by Jim the Realtor | Oct 25, 2012 | Actives/Pendings, How Hot?, North County Coastal
While the whole NSDCC market feels like it is cooking, the inventory shortage and resulting dash to tie up properties is restricted to the lower end of each area.
We’ve considered a 2:1 ratio of active listings to pendings to be a fairly normal market, and the higher-end of local markets are in that range – or worse. But the lower-ends have been scorching hot:
Detached-Home Listings, Under/Over $1,000,000
Town or Area |
Zip Code |
Under $1M Actives/Pend+Cont |
Over $1M Actives/Pend+Cont |
SE Carlsbad |
92009 |
51/113 |
30/9 |
SW Carlsbad |
92011 |
37/47 |
14/8 |
Encinitas |
92024 |
38/57 |
71/29 |
Carmel Vly |
92130 |
22/44 |
57/27 |
Total |
AllAbove |
148/261 |
172/73 |
It supports the notion that there isn’t much move-up buying, at least not up into our higher-end regions. Most sellers fall into three categories: those leaving the county, estates that are liquidating, and the exhausted over-encumbered folks. It is similar in the ultra-high end markets too:
Detached-Home Listings, Under/Over $2,000,000
Town or Area |
Zip Code |
Under $2M Actives/Pend+Cont |
Over $2M Actives/Pend+Cont |
RSF |
67+91 |
39/25 |
167/11 |
DelMar/SB |
14+75 |
52/43 |
49/8 |
La Jolla |
92037 |
68/40 |
86/19 |
Total |
AllAbove |
159/108 |
302/38 |
The contingents make up about 25% of the Pend+Cont totals, and would make those categories appear slightly bloated, but the short-sales are more likely to close now than ever – because buyers are willing to hang around longer.
Want to purchase a house around North SD County’s coastal region for less than $1,000,000? You can expect a very challenging competition for the good buys. Want to spend more than $2,000,000? You’re in the driver’s seat!
by Jim the Realtor | Oct 17, 2012 | Actives/Pendings, Inventory, Thinking of Buying?, Thinking of Selling?
From Zillow: The inventory of lower-priced homes for sale, which are commonly sought by first-time homebuyers, has dropped by more than 40 percent in California over the past year, according to a new Zillow analysis, which tracks changes in the number of homes listed for sale on Zillow across the country as of Sept. 30, 2012 and compares inventory changes in the bottom, middle and upper tiers of home prices.
“First-time homebuyers are being squeezed out of the market by falling inventory and the rapid influx of investors looking to buy basic homes to rent out to the growing population of people who have recently been foreclosed upon,” said Stan Humphries, Zillow chief economist. “Investors are paying in cash and can close sooner, which is more favorable to banks and homeowners looking to sell.”
Nationally, inventory rates have dropped by one-fifth (-19.4 percent) across all homes with inventory declining the most in higher-priced homes (-22 percent).
In the largest 30 metro areas, inventory across all tiers has fallen the most in the Sacramento (-42.4 percent), San Francisco, (-42.4 percent) and San Diego (-40.7 percent) metros; and has fallen the least in the Cincinnati (-9.5 percent), Portland, Ore. (-10.8 percent) and St. Louis, Mo. (-14.5 percent) areas.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While these percentages seem shocking, this isn’t bad news – it’s a sign of an active, productive marketplace. There has been a similar supply of homes for sale, they are just selling faster. The overall counts look fairly subtle too:
Total Number of MLS Listings, Jan 1st to Oct. 15th
2011 – 57,800
2012 – 52,300 -10%
Total Number of Det. & Att. Listings Sold, Jan 1st to Oct. 15th
2011 – 25,994
2012 – 28,847 +11%
Housing Tracker shows that the active inventory is at all-time lows – but they include the contingents:

Compare these counts for San Diego County, and how things have changed since early 2009 when the market first started to pick up:
SD County Det. & Att |
Actives |
Cont & Pend |
Ratio |
Sept. 2008 |
11,741 |
4,082 |
2.88 |
Oct. 2009 |
6,630 |
6,482 |
1.02 |
Oct. 2012 |
5,607 |
9,157 |
0.61 |
What a difference since 2008! Plus we saw that half of the listings are going contingent/pending within the first 2-4 weeks too. It’s a hyper-fast, efficient market, if you can just get the price right.
by Jim the Realtor | Jun 26, 2012 | Actives/Pendings |
You can see the hot spots around our area from comparing the actives to pendings. We have seen in the past that a 2:1 actives-to-pendings ratio is a good barometer to indicate a ‘healthy’ marketplace.
With short sales being approved faster and buyers hanging on, I’ve included the contingent listings with the pendings. Here is how the detached-listing counts break down:
Area or Zip Code |
ACT |
C+P |
Ratio (X:1) |
Csbd 92009 |
115 |
136 |
0.84 |
Csbd 92011 |
63 |
64 |
1.00 |
Ency 92024 |
131 |
97 |
1.35 |
RSF/DM/SB |
371 |
78 |
4.76 |
San Elijo Hills |
27 |
62 |
0.43 |
S-luz 92127 |
117 |
147 |
0.80 |
CV 92130 |
138 |
97 |
1.42 |
To see every area except the ultra-highenders be well under the 2:1 ratio is remarkable.
by Jim the Realtor | Nov 20, 2011 | Actives/Pendings, Inventory, Market Conditions, North County Coastal, Sales and Price Check |
When I say, “the inventory is thin”, it really means that the demand for good-looking-properties-that-are-priced-reasonably is healthy. While that would seem obvious in any market, it is worth repeating when all you hear is how bad the real estate market is from the mainstream media.
We have also seen that there is a relationship between inventory and sales/pricing.
When there are fewer houses on the market, buyers feel pressed to gobble up the ones that are available – and end up paying whatever it takes. Flash back to 2003 to remember the max-frenzy conditions!
Here are the comparisons of the total number of detached listings/number of solds between January 1st and October 31st in North SD County Coastal (La Jolla to Carlsbad). There isn’t a direct connection between them – some sold this year were listed last year – but the TL/S-ratio trend is worth watching:
Year |
Total Listings |
Solds |
TL/S Ratio |
1999 |
4,807 |
2,762 |
1.74 |
2000 |
4,410 |
2,787 |
1.58 |
2001 |
5,291 |
2,514 |
2.10 |
2002 |
5,373 |
3,139 |
1.71 |
2003 |
4,753 |
3,299 |
1.44 |
2004 |
4,698 |
2,891 |
1.63 |
2005 |
4,935 |
2,593 |
1.90 |
2006 |
5,496 |
2,204 |
2.49 |
2007 |
4,829 |
2,180 |
2.22 |
2008 |
4,687 |
1,799 |
2.61 |
2009 |
4,521 |
1,791 |
2.52 |
2010 |
4,717 |
2,072 |
2.28 |
2011 |
4,460 |
2,162 |
2.06 |
This year we’ve had the fewest listings since 2000, and more sales since 2007, the height of easy financing. Yet the balance feels relatively healthy, and like the old Jim Ratio of actives-to-pendings, I think we can say that a 2.0 TL/S-ratio is about right.
(For those with MLS access who are checking, because Sandicor deletes withdrawn listings from previous years, I deleted them from all years – there were only 211 this year. The expireds and cancelled listings are included.)
While it feels like there are very few good deals available, does it mean that there has been pressure on pricing lately? Let’s compare detached sales and pricing in the same January 1st-to-October 31st period of this year, to last year:
Town or Area |
Zip Code |
Sales 2010/2011 |
Avg $/sf 2010/2011 |
Cardiff |
92007 |
55/73 |
$483/$469 |
Carlsbad NW |
92008 |
112/137 |
$324/$313 |
Carlsbad SE |
92009 |
446/429 |
$269/$253 |
Carlsbad NE |
92010 |
80/123 |
$260/$238 |
Carlsbad SW |
92011 |
173/155 |
$295/$292 |
Del Mar |
92014 |
78/137 |
$619/$680 |
Encinitas |
92024 |
328/305 |
$356/$352 |
La Jolla |
92037 |
214/228 |
$630/$595 |
RSF |
67+91 |
161/171 |
$433/$432 |
Solana Bch |
92075 |
73/57 |
$538/$560 |
Carmel Vly |
92130 |
352/348 |
$342/$330 |
Total |
All |
2,072/2,162 |
$378/$378 |
With the exception of the Del Mar explosion, those numbers look as steady as possible.
by Jim the Realtor | Jul 11, 2011 | Actives/Pendings |
Back in the day when there weren’t loads of short sales, we used to compare the actives to pendings to get a read on the relative ‘health’ of the marketplace.
With banks pushing harder to close the short sales (though the timelines are still uncertain), and because the buyers who have secured a short sale have hopefully done so at an attractive price making it more likely for them to hang around, let’s add the listings marked ‘contingent’ to the pending category:
Here’s our scorecard, historically, of the ACT/PEND ratio:
0-2 Hot market
3-4 Regular market
5-6 Market in trouble
7-8 Too many choices
9+ Freefall
Town or Area |
ACT |
PEND+CONT |
A/P+C |
Carmel Vly |
212 |
69 |
3.07 |
Carlsbad |
481 |
227 |
2.12 |
Del Mar/SolB |
201 |
36 |
5.58 |
Encinitas |
189 |
73 |
2.59 |
La Jolla |
265 |
54 |
4.91 |
RSF |
271 |
36 |
7.53 |
Totals |
1,619 |
495 |
4.27 |
There were days that RSF and La Jolla were 10.0+. Can we call it relatively healthy now?
by Jim the Realtor | Jul 1, 2010 | Actives/Pendings, Sales and Price Check, Thinking of Buying? |
The NAR Pending Home Sales Index was released today. They reported a 30% decline in May pendings (vs. April) and it didn’t even garner it’s own post at Calculated Risk, so either nobody cares about what’s coming out of NAR (most likely), or the drop was expected.
The index is a national reading, how are we doing in San Diego County? Here are the detached closed sales for SD County:
Month |
2009 |
2010 |
April |
1,997, $215/sf |
1,865, $248/sf |
May |
1,992, $225/sf |
2,150, $252/sf |
June |
1,949, $227/sf |
1,789, $258/sf* |
Totals |
5,938 |
5,722 |
*June, 2010’s number of sales will probably increase 10% or so, due to late-reporters.
Compared to last year, the demand looks steady, even with average square-foot costs up about 10%. The tax credits probably helped, but now that they’re over, can we get a better feel for what’s coming?
Here’s a look at the current detached pendings.
Those from last year have closed, while about half of this year’s numbers are still pending, and subject to fallout (20% to 25%?). But the 2,392 listings marked ‘contingent’ (short sales) are not included, and should pick up the difference, so I think we can make some decent comparisons. These are detached listings grouped by the month they were marked pending:
SD County Detached Pendings
Month |
2009 |
2010 (# closed already) |
April |
2,123, $217/sf |
2,334, $256/sf (2,019) |
May |
1,947, $237/sf |
1,814, $262/sf (1,039) |
June |
1,931, $238/sf |
1,998, $240/sf (214) |
Totals |
6,001 |
6,144 |
Only 315 of April’s remaining pendings are still eligble for the fed tax credit, and none of these will get state cheese. The local detached market has been resilient!
Once you add in the contingents, this summer’s closings are shaping up to be stronger than last year, without the tax credits, and in the face of unemployment, economy, etc.
The inventory is on the rise though, according to housingtracker.net, which is probably more due to so many over-priced turkeys (OPTs) not selling, than anything else. Expect that to continue for a couple more weeks before we see the motivated sellers quicken their pace to the exits:
Week of SFH+Condo |
Inventory |
25th %tile |
Median |
75th %tile |
2010-06-28 |
16,501 |
$249,000 |
$398,000 |
$689,900 |
2010-06-21 |
15,208 |
$249,900 |
$399,000 |
$699,000 |
2010-06-14 |
16,111 |
$249,000 |
$395,000 |
$680,000 |
2010-06-07 |
15,190 |
$248,000 |
$395,000 |
$695,000 |
2010-05-31 |
15,730 |
$248,000 |
$395,000 |
$690,000 |
The inventory rise/fall is measuring the list-price accuracy. There are plenty of buyers who would like to take advantage of the sub-5% mortgage rates, and if sellers can live with just a little less, we will have a very productive third quarter (might be a big ‘if’ though).